TiaFix.com

June 14, 2009

The long tail… wags happily.

Filed under: — tiafix @ Jun 14, 09 | 10:55 am

Where am I? Well, I’ve been in China for over a year. I’m doing alright. :)

As some of you may know, I swapped my videogame cheerleader-type outfit for a teacher’s uniform. The upgraded apparell suits me nicely. I’ve never been one to give up my entrepreneurial (sp?) badge, though - and thanks to my rennaissance nature inherited from my dad - embarked on a quest to become a baby guru. Not that I have any of my own - but knowing what makes them tick, and how to make them tock, suddenly (or maybe not so suddenly) seemed of the utmost importance. Thus I traded in the internet advertising short gains for a long-term investment - Etonkids Beginnings.

It’s a long story, and I’m summarizing poorly. But basically, I read a lot of books, observed and attended a lot of training, practiced and experimented in classrooms (no children were harmed in the process, i assure you) until I came up with a curricum, a design, an idea, an integrated philosophy, and a name: Beginnings - which after many many many months of tooling, launched, and just expanded to a total of 5 campuses throughout Beijing. We started with one. Now I’m at 5. Maybe by 2010 we’ll be at 10. With luck. :)

What is Beginnings? Well, it’s a mother/toddler transitions program. It helps very young children adjust from a home environment to the routines of a Montessori classroom. It also offer parent education on Montessori and RIE techniques. It teaches responsibility, grace and ettiquette, socialization, kindness, patience, and the importance of observation. It’s unique. I’m happy with the project and where it’s heading. If you’d be so kind, please wish me as much luck as you can spare. I could use it. :) 

Since I developed the program, I’m also running it… Thanks to the educational and financial support of Etonkids and their exceptional academic advisory staff. It’s a big job. I’m a jill of all trades by night, and a teacher by day. Lots of hours. The rewards are quite personal and fulfilling. It takes a lot to abandon a profession (data slinger) and incorporate life’s lessons into embracing a new one (baby watcher). But that’s part of the fun - challenging oneself to do something new and to make a positive difference in the world.

I guess I just wanted to put an update out there for all those who might be curious. Where in the world did Tia Fix go? Well, she’s still in Beijing. Doing different things, tackling an amazing project (some might say), and enjoying the life shift from quick fix to long solution.

Say hi sometime. :)

 >^,,^<

June 14, 2008

What have I been doing?

Filed under: Uncategorized — tiafix @ Jun 14, 08 | 12:50 am

Ah, one site change, one comment. I love the internet.

So, this blog has been idle for almost 2 years. In that time frame, I’ve been busy and lazy. A wonderful combination that is afforded only to those who know best on wringing every drop out of life, like the wet towel it is. Or wet dog. Depending on the day.

I’ll start with the most recent business venture.

I’m freelancing for a fantastic little online video game marketing and public relations firm MMOSmart, based out of California with offices all over the place. Headed up by Steven Wade, a young guru (in comparison to my years) who first made his mark at Aeria. They’re currently localizing some Chinese MMORPGs for North American and European markets. It’s awesome work. It’s a no brainer that I’m in Beijing and good things are happening. Current work in progress, which should have a beta out shortly, is called Childhood. Great anime style graphics, interface, and a strong user base established in China already. More information can be found at http://www.gamegravity.com - it just launched.

Game Gravity is another project by the MMOSmart crew. Forums, videos, stuff for gamers by gamers. Targetting one’s brand or message to this demographic is good ROI when they’re glued to their keyboards for hours every day. In-Game-Advertising for Childhood is an option, or so I’m told. I’m not a coder, I just make stuff happen. The big question of the day, is, why am I writing this little blip about myself in fragmented sentences? Must be the hour. It’s 9:30am on a Saturday in Beijing. It must be the excitement of a new world waking me up so early.

Previous to MMOSmart, I was handling press and community relations for Digital Bazaar. Based out of Blacksburg, VA. Speaking of coders, this brilliant nest of enterprising young gentleman is headed up by Manu Sporny - an old Model United Nations comrade from high school days. Not only did Digital Bazaar develop an amazing software which tracks and facilitates digital media sales and distribution through P2P networks, but they went public (as in, they opened it up to the people of the web… heh) with http://www.bitmunk.com - It houses one of the largest legal independent music databases in the world, AND it’s outfitted for the semantic web. Which means.. well… as mentioned, I’m not a coder, but it means great things. And yes, I’m totally using ’semantic web’ as a prepositional phrase / noun - which might be okay, but probably isn’t. Feel free to correct me in the comments section.

Hm. What else? My grandma died. That’s a little depressing for a blog, I suppose, but to wrap it up, that’s one of the reasons I stayed in the states so long after Korea. Oh. Did I mention I was in Korea? Yeah, that was awesome. Korea 2006-2007, China 2008-2009 and beyond. It’s been a nice little time of adventure and relaxation. Figuring out what’s important and where I can make a difference in the world. Trust me, it’s not all about advertising and marketing and public relations, though sometimes life can feel like it. As for now, I’m going to enjoy a cup of coffee and wake up and hope that these fragmented sentences carry forward to someone out in the world and ring a bell. Hopefully, not their alarm. It’s certainly too early for someone else in the cosmos, and I’d hate to be an enabler for bad grammar.

>^,,^< …{tia}

June 13, 2008

Hey, I’m in China. >^,,^<

Filed under: Uncategorized — tiafix @ Jun 13, 08 | 12:46 pm

Hello people. Long time no chat.

 Quite simply. I’m in Beijing. It’s pretty wild. The Mandarin is coming along. Business is good. The olympics are just around the corner. Adventure after adventure awaits.

In other news, I changed the site look to make it easier to read comments and old articles. I was feeling reminiscent.

It might not be as funky as the old one. But it’s more user friendly. That’s a good thing, generally.

Enjoy, and I hope to write more often.

>^,,^<… {tia fix}

November 29, 2006

Make Money Doing Nothing On Second Life!

Filed under: — tiafix @ Nov 29, 06 | 2:30 pm

No, this isn’t an mlm scheme. Or maybe it is?

Not sure. I really haven’t figured out all the angles to my newest obsession, SecondLife.com - I’ve typed about it briefly in a previous blog. It’s basically this 3D virtual world to hang out and meet cool cats. Supposedly an elite intelligencia hang out there. I have yet to meet them. I tend to think this is because there are no intelligencia on at the hours I frequent SecondLife - of course, it could be that I’m just not part of the intelligencia. -snarfs-

Regardless, beyond cybersex (there’s a lot of it going on, always, go figure) and gambling (not really surprised there either) there’s a wildly popular phenomenon known as ‘camping’ for most of the tenants of this virtual world. Camping is how you make money for doing nothing.

It’s so blatant, the game actually reminds you that you are earning money for nothing, every few minutes, via little reminders, in the form of an instant message or an email. I received several emails to my gmail account tonight, stating: “You’ve just earned $2 for doing nothing!” At first I thought it was just spam. Perhaps it is. But who am I, the proud owner of two brand new Linden dollars, to call names? Let them alert me to their lunacy for giving away cash for my idling avatar! I have no qualms. Plus, it gives me something to write about.

What is camping, you ask? Well, you take your avatar (the little cyber “you”) and you plop it in a chair that says ‘camp here and earn $X per 10 minutes). And thus, you “camp” - and you earn Linden dollars for the minutes you spend in this virtual space. Supposedly, people who own these chairs are awarded some sort of stipend for activity in their virtual space via the creators of SecondLife.

This idling is fantastic on many levels. The first part is, you just log in, click once or twice, and you’re suddenly camping. In other words, you really don’t have to download anything big, or type anything long, or talk to anyone for a good while - you just click, click, and ignore! You’re instantly idle and earning cash. The next fantastic-o level-oso is: you can play World of Warcraft in another window! Or heck, open Excel and get crackin on those quarterly reports! Your boss will be amazed at your ingenuity! You just figured out how to make money /while/ doing something else! It’s genius. Really. I love it. Just give me some credit or a by line or something if you read it here first. Thanks.

Despite how awesome this is, there is a downside for newcomers to the SecondLife phenom. For instance, the whole camping spiel is a misleading incentive for purported user activity. Not only does it have the potential to mislead advertisers (cough) (do they even guage user activity to land their commercial backings from companies like IBM and Nissan? Hm. I dunno…) but it also misleads newbie chicks like me who are trying to meet cool cats.

Many times I have walked into areas, expecting to see dozens of people all chatting about intelligencia sortof things, only to find lifeless, quiet, bits of code, in the shape of crappy avatars, sitting in chairs, doing nothing, and the occasional auto-message blaring “BLAHBLAHBLAH just earned $2 Linden Dollars - for doing nothing!” It’s rather disheartening. And it reminds me of the cpa industry. But I digress…

To break down the injustice of it all, since so many avatars are stuck in a single area, “camping” out - it looks like that particular area is popular. Newbies like me want to find popular and inhabited areas, so we can meet intelligencia. However, with the advent of camping, a newbie walks in to find no one is really “there” in this supposed popular, inhabbited area. It’s just empty avatars. They’re all real people, sure, but they’re idling. They’re at work. In other windows. In other countries. Sleeping. Eating a taco. Watching tv. Whatever. All the while, their cable modems are pinging along happily, earning them cash while they do nothing. Genius.

That’s why I camp, afterall. Or atleast, have just started too.

I’m certain that SL creators have some huge MLM scheme ultimately in mind… Something akin to “build it and they will come” or “camp here, and people will think we’re popular, when in fact, we’re not.” Good for them. Let them waste their venture capital funding on this sortof thing. I dig it.

Granted, it could be a very complex and successful strategy for SL to reward its constituents. SecondLife has definitely rose in popularity over the last 6 months, and the media hawking of SL has been non-stop (that’s why I logged on!). And yet, no one talks about camping? Which I don’t quite understand. Maybe it’s the dark secret of SL? Maybe it’s like being a gold-digger on World of Warcraft? Maybe it’s just lame to waste electricty like that? Maybe I didn’t research enough? Eh. Could be.

Despite my minimal efforts to research ‘camping’ and why it exists in the first place, I have been able to determine a crucial, exciting, and important fact - camping, albeit lame, seemingly pointless, and perhaps a waste of electricity, really does make hard, cold, transferable, cash - all for doing nothing. Woo-hoo! My cable bill is already thanking me. And I, in turn, thank SecondLife - for creating this seemingly unjust, and perverse way to make money. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

>^,,^<

(more…)

November 19, 2006

Will this work in my First Life?

Filed under: — tiafix @ Nov 19, 06 | 1:26 pm

So, today I joined Second Life.

I was blown away.

Impressed.

Thrilled.

Then depressed. Anxious. Nervous.

What on earth are we doing with our time? Logging into virtual worlds? It sortof overwhelmed me.

I mean, don’t get me wrong, I’ve been logging into virtual communities since I was 12. I’m old hat at this sortof thing. But this is the first time I really felt some sort of negative, gut churning, reaction to it.

Second Life is /awesome/. It’s interface is easy to figure out, there are admin all over the place to help you with any questions, you can customize /everything/, and basically it’s a ‘if you dream it, build it’ sorta place.

Commercialism and the entrepreneurial spirit are rampant. It’s without a doubt, rockin. I could totally spend a lot of time there. Over a million other people currently are. But should I? That’s one of those philosophical, self-discovery questions that I’d prefer to have with a trained therapist, rather than my blog. At any rate, I had fun, and I’ll definitely go back, at the very least, to see if I can make some cash with my own entrepreneurial nature. Which is likely. Here are some highlights from today’s first jaunt:

a) You can spend 15 minutes or an hour tweaking the shape of your nose. That’s just one of the many body parts and clothing options to play with. Oodles of time are lost or ’spent wisely’, depending on your viewpoint, on tweaking out the appearance of your character. It’s totally feasible to even create someone who looks ‘just like you’ (or me). The ironic thing, though, is once you tweak yourself to look like yourself, you can just as easily tweak yourself to look male, or like a giraffe, or a dancing alien - it doesn’t matter what you look like in Second Life. At the end of the day, you are just a name, and some code.

b) Guys are still guys, and if you’re a girl, they’re going to ask you for sex. I shouldn’t be surprised I suppose, but I was surprised at how quickly people got down to business once I logged on and said ‘hi’. Apparently, Second Life has a growing market for a ‘red light district’. Go on, make a mint in Linden dollars as a virtual sex addict! -tosses confetti-

c) You can actually make money doing nothing but playing on the internet. I used to call this ‘online advertising’ - but the cool cats at Second Life have come up with a more innocous way to make advertising and cash growth on the internet, second nature. Er. Second Life!

d) It really is the metaverse. If you’ve ever read SnowCrash and thought the quasi-future concepts were thrilling and scary and might actually happen one day? Well, you were right. The metaverse is here. Your avatars are groovy. Anyone can join, and soon, everyone will. Yay, Second Life, you took our dreams and made them real. Er… Really virtual. Er… Virtually real. Er… now I’m just being silly.

That’s all for now. Just a a little blurb on the trials and tribulations of my internet adventures. Oh. And I’m in South Korea. And everything’s fine. I just hope my DNS server is working so that this will post properly.

Rock on and see you on the flip side.

>^,,^< … {tia fix}

July 28, 2006

{yAWn}

Filed under: — tiafix @ Jul 28, 06 | 10:54 am

I’ve been asleep for awhile.

Actually, that’s a lie. I’ve just been on MySpace.

Until today. I was deleted. Not by choice, mind you. Just a strange click, click, kapooi. Gone.

What’s weird is that my level of frustration with this particular internet-community portal has increased exponentially over the last few weeks, due to power outtages and posted pac-man games, etc. I slapped up a quick blog about it on www.tagworld.com - but unfortunately, as of 12:12pm EST, TagWorld is down too. What the hell is coming to this world? It’s like it’s the end of days or something. So frustrating.

And since, well, I couldn’t blog on MySpace. Or TagWorld. I thought I’d wake up and come type out a little ditty on tiafix.com - afterall, it’s my site. I should take better care of it. This site is like that potted plant on your porch, you know, the one that has 2 or 3 plants growing in it. None of which are the original plant, and all of which are weeds. Ho hum. I’m sure I could come up with a better analogy, I’d just rather leave it at that and move on to the next topic.

Don’t ever ask me to manicure your lawn.

Beyond that tidbit, there’s not much else to type. MySpace deleted me, and I am miffed. TagWorld is down, and I am miffed. TiaFix.com looks jakey and I can’t code worth a darn, so I am miffed. It’s raining outside, and I’d be miffed at that, except I like rain.

I’ve been picking up some freelance work, brokering and consulting. More specifically for site owners who would prefer to work on their content than their revenue streams. If you fancy some advice, it’s always free, and I’m full of it, so go ahead and give me a shout. Also, if you have a need for canadian consumer data, just give me a wink. Of course, don’t email me on tiafix.com - why not look for me on MySpace, I’m always there. OH WAIT. That’s right. I was deleted. A year’s worth of blogs, deleted. A year’s worth of friend collecting, deleted. A year’s worth of… well, I guess there wasn’t much else to the site. Okay, no big whoop. No big loss.

This rant has gone on long enough and I’m going to sit on my porch, have some coffee and a cigarette and figure out a way to kick MySpace’s butt, as well as swap a tiafix.com site redesign in exchange for advertising advice. I mean, it’s the coolest site name in the world - tiafix.com - right? MySpace is alright. TagWorld is ‘cool’ - but Tia Fix? Pashaw! The coolest.

In the meantime, do not email anything at tiafix.com, due to about 5 billion trillion pieces of spam that come my way everyday. You can start to newly spam me over at gmail of course. first name last name over at gmail, ya dig?

>^,,^< … {tia fix}

December 23, 2005

Why Is Wired Courting The Online Ad Industry?

Filed under: — tiafix @ Dec 23, 05 | 7:03 pm

It’s a little weird. The print publication for all good geeks and geekettes who love gadgets and tech and anything future and bio and imagination-filled are starting to see some article topics that those in the online advertising industry have been discussing, blogging, and chatting over AIM, some few years.

In January’s issue of Wired mag - they spot a huge diatribe about the evils of click fraud and the perils that search engine marketers must face. They do a little shout out to CPA advertising as a solution, and raise the blinds on a new model emerging which is CPA PPC - meaning, the ppc advertisers only pay when a click creates a sale or a registration on the text ad (be it static or contextually delivered).

Back in December’s issue, I literally read with mouth agape, as Wired quoted my favorite Harvard student, Ben Edelman, and other’s opinions on the SpyWare effect that’s raging on in current debate. They even mentioned Direct Revenue, but left out the child pornography reference. That’s likely why they’re a more credible publication, and www.tiafix.com is just a blog. But I digress.

The point is, this mainstream pub which feature ‘pre-fab houses of the future’, tips on how to download music without getting caught, brain scan imaging for future lie detector afficienados, and lots of things that we should all buy to be hip and cool is now reporting on our industry. I’ve had a subscription for the last 12 months, and I don’t recall reading anything that made me go “hey, they’re talking about me” - but the last two issues have stood out - because they are. They didn’t literally print “Tia Fix said this….” like they did with Ben, but it’s close enough. I’m one Kevin Bacon reference away from being published in Wired, and that’s good enough for me.

Not only are they talking about Ben, ( who my company and our parent corporation, Think Partnership, sponsored to attend Ad:Tech NYC 2005, and are also sponsoring for him to speak at a special session at Affiliate Summit Las Vegas, this January 8-10th, ), and spyware and it’s bad news for biz approach, but they’re pinging the click frauders. It’s like Wired suddenly pointed its antenna at a 6 billion dollar industry (yes, 6 billion - on a side note, did anyone else read that the video game industry is only at 2 billion? what the heck is that about? did I mis-read that somewhere? how in the world can the online ad industry usurp the VG biz that’s been going steady for 30+ years? oh, well, i guess it’s not that crazy. but i must have my numbers wrong. someone please post a comment and correct me. thanks.) for the sake of aquiring more biz savvy readers instead of 14-24 year olds looking to buy something neat. I’m sure there’s a mag out there with better demographics than Wired to reach that market, but I can’t help but grin at Wired’s coverage, and grimace to think why they’re covering it - I mean, sure, it’s totally appropriate, and it’s a great story - with bad guys, and good guys, and money involved, and innocent consumers and all that good stuff - but what it really comes down to is, it’s a marketing ploy. I think the associate editor’s were like, “what target market can we improve upon with our article headers? how about the online advertising folks?” and thus, the last 2 articles for Wired were born. Aren’t the birds and bees neat?

Of course, we used to do something quite similar with the Adbumb, which supposedly will no longer exist in a few weeks. How interesting is that? I’d give it about 8% of my interest, at the moment, but since I’m going to continue writing about it, it’s better to say it occupies around 20%, the other %’s of my attention are on the Christmas presents lining my floor, and the game of Neo-Contra my husband is currently playing. Oh, and my cat Big Boy is sitting beside me and licking my arm. He’s such a fat cat. Seriously fat. He’s on a diet, I swear, but he’s really big boned. But I digress. When I first heard about Adbumb becoming some other name which I didn’t find impressive in the slightest, atleast in regards to ‘branding’ - it’s a lame name, whatever it is since I obviously can’t even remember it - ( i mean, the Adbumb is a much better name, that’s all I’m saying ) - at any rate, when I first heard about it , it definitely occupied as much as 50% of my attention before I decided it was just a ploy to get advertising dollars. As is everything in our biz. So it quickly dropped off.

I think Wired is doing much the same thing. I’ve read there are 50,000 online marketing executives who read an online mag like Adbumb (um, does anyone do an audit on these things anymore?) or 200,000 that subscribe to Marketing Sherpa, or what have you, and so they’re saying they want a piece of the that action and catering to an audience with a high disposable income. Yay Wired.

I guess I just wanted to rant on about it a little, as I hadn’t heard anything from anyone about it, anywhere, on any board, or email list, or AIM chat, and thus, I was dissapointed and decided to throw this out to the masses with the hope of pulling in atleast one good comment, hopefully from someone who works at Wired. Or maybe Ben Edelman and his thoughts on his quotes in Wired. Or maybe Pesach Lattin, and his thoughts on the Adbumb dissipating into the ether after 3 years. That’s all I’m saying - doesn’t anybody talk anymore? That’s a punch line from a joke. I’ll leave the body of which for you to discuss amongst yourselves. And the first person to send me the correct body of said joke I reference will receive an inflatabile dinosaur. Promise. >^,,^<

AIM: tiafix

or

tiafix at (yes an at) gmail dot (yes a dot) com

November 17, 2005

In an Effort to Appease the Masses

Filed under: — tiafix @ Nov 17, 05 | 2:32 pm

This is a quick note to say Ad:tech was a hoot - next year, be sure to bring a map of the exhibit hall - kudos to Ben Edelman for his amazing speaking gig sponsored by http://www.kowabunga.com and http://www.primaryads.com

Both of which are swell companies. If you want more info on them, AIM me: TiaFix

Hm. What else? I’ve decided to post this quick little tidbit just so that it seems more blog like and less ‘heavy article’ like for the mass readership I have going. Mass readership you ask? Hey, don’t believe what the counter says on the lower left hand corner - it’s totally off. There are hundreds of thousands of readers who have never checked out this site and the counter doesn’t register any one of them, so something is obviously not right with it.

Speaking of ‘right with it’ - my new favorite site, for anyone who likes to buy really wonderful things that make all your house guests go ‘ooh, i wish i had something as cool as that in my home, so jealous jealous jealous…’ is to recommend this little piece of good web programming blog like place: http://www.crowndozen.com

If you go to CrownDozen and notice a review of a 12″ by some guy named Jesse, guess what? That’s my husband! It’s his first vinyl write-up for the site, so I thought I’d throw in a plug for it, because I’m shamelessly fun like that when I realize I’m writing and the chance of anyone actually reading this is slim to none so I can harp all I want to. It’s my party. And it’s my husband. Hah hah - I’ve got one in my home and you don’t. Jealous Jealous Jealous.

With that being said, I shall draw this rant to a close. Go on and read a past blog post or something, they are much more informative and entertaining I assure you. - tia fix

>^,,^<

October 27, 2005

WARNING: Adults Let Children Become Adults - Proceed With Caution

Filed under: — tiafix @ Oct 27, 05 | 8:13 am

I?m a regular lurker of http://www.Adrants.com ? it?s a site that spoofs advertising and all its zaniness and generally allows for casual social commentary, some good, some bad, and more often than not, shows an inordinate amount of boobs, which I?m certain is social commentary in itself.

One particular post stood out from last week, called: “Advertisers: Wake Up And Smell The Sex”. Folks, before you throw the baby out with the bathwater, you?ll be pleasantly surprised to hear this post, authored by Steve Hall ? was in fact commentary on the prevalence of sex in advertising as a propellant of corruption in our youth. The post, and the many comments left by Adrants? readers, continued to discuss how children are dressing sexier because they see it in ads, and are acting sexier because they see it on tv; and all the arguments we adults have heard in some form or another, regarding some medium or another. Take an adult theme of any sort, let a child have access to it, and you?re corrupting them. Period. That?s the argument.

It?s a similar argument posed by my college mentor, Neil Postman, which he penned in his book, ?Building a Bridge to the 18th Century?. Neil has passed on, but the book published in 1999 still speaks fresh to a lesson gone out of fashion after 300 years, a lesson most adults of the 21st century forgot. The lesson, and the argument we adults have not heard enough in the last 5, or 10, or 15 years, is that ‘childhood’ was a concept fostered in the 1700’s by some dude who noticed and enjoyed the innocence of youth in his children and made it his life?s mission to keep them that way as long as possible. This dude recognized that ?childhood? was a special state of being, unlike the state of being that he nor any of the other soured adults could possess any longer. Please recall, the tales of yore, where 12 year olds were cowboys, dads, wives, mothers, ranch owners, and farm hands, even thieves and murderers. In the 18th century, you were an adult and treated as an adult and punishable by law as an adult, when you were still a kid. The ?age of reason? smacked everybody at 7, and after that it was downhill. Seven was the new forty. Heck, most people didn?t even live to see forty! The concept of ‘childhood’ was fabricated in the last 300 years, thanks to kindergartens and public school systems; thanks to this one dude who decided his kids wouldn?t grow up to see the evils of the world, as long as he had anything to do with it.

When I read this in Postman?s book, I was awestruck, because I had just assumed kids were kids, always and forever ? and the mysteries of puberty, the terrible twos, and tweenagers were set to a specific timeline, just like getting your drivers license. But in truth, no timeline exists for maturity, for education, for information dissemination in today?s world. We teach our infants to read, and our 7 year olds kung-fu, all of them watch the nightly news just like the rest of us, with its natural disasters and politics and murders and sex scandals and religious persecutions, and most of them get on the internet to find whatever they want, whenever they want it, from whomever will let them have it? at age 8, 11, 14, or 3. The timeline for childhood has disappeared in practice; it exists only as a lesson forgotten.

Neil touched upon something that was intuitive and prophetic - children of today have access to the same information systems that we adults do, we are no longer sheltering them and fostering a ?childlike? state through public schooling or even at home, thus they are becoming mini-adults, sans the emotional maturity or simple experience of dealing with the issues they?ve ?absorbed? directly. If I watch a TV show about re-tiling my bathroom, sometimes I feel empowered enough and knowledgeable enough on the topic, that I?m almost tempted to pick up a sledgehammer and start the job. The truth is, I don?t know jack-diddily about re-tiling my bathroom, let alone how to use a sledgehammer ? but the television viewing process fosters within me a sense of knowledge and experience regarding the subject, which doesn?t exist. Man o? man ? you should try and talk to me after I?ve checked out doityourself.com! It?s like I was Bob Villa or something ? and I?m guessing Bob had a seriously structured ?childhood?. Just a hunch.

If you think I?m bad after I see advertising disguised as information, for products that make me a super hero in home improvement, think what kids are doing. They watch the same TV that ‘we adults’ do. They watch the same news channels that ‘we adults’ do and they have access to the same Internet and alternative educational sources that we do. They eat the same food, they’re dressed the same way, they keep the same sleeping schedules, and as scary as it is to admit, they have sex just like us. They?re taking in all the information that we do on a daily basis, but they?re taking it in faster, better, with more hormones to jumble it up, because they?re just big ?ole sponges that suck up everything in their path. Before we were adults we were the same as the kids today, except the dude who invented Kindergarten knew this, and our parents were still practicing what they?d been taught: that if you limit your children?s exposure to worldly elements, they?ll stay kids. Forever. I know several ?grown men? who at 29 are no more emotionally mature than 14 year olds. Kids are us, and until they finish puberty, they?re just a foot or two shorter.

It’s important for people to recognize that children aren’t children anymore, and the reason behind it IS advertising, is entertainment, is lack of structure in the home, is more access, more freedom, more technology, more everything! It?s because we?re lazy with everything that we?ve achieved that to keep it all going we hardly have time to implement the structure that?s required to keep our babies babies. You have to be seriously OCD to raise a kid these days and hope that they don?t start questioning your investment choices at 11, or hacking into your bank account and buying web-cam sessions via sex.com, I mean, what kid /doesn?t/ type ?sex? the first thing into google these days? Really.

The scary thing is, I don?t know if having ?little adults? is such a bad thing. Maybe I?m crazy, but it seems like it took some serious pioneering cojones of ?little adults? back in the 16th, 17th, and 18th century to get us where we are now. I?m half the mind these days to think that fostering ?childhood? was a mistake. I should amend this to say, a mistake from an evolutionary, top of the food chain, stand point. There?s part of me that wants to see little workhorses, and little baby chemists, and little toddler fashionistas. But that?s the part of me that?s lazy, because I?m buying into this notion that I can pump out a few of these kids, let them soak up education through some other source, and as long as they?re under my roof, they can do my dishes, and if they?re smart enough, my taxes, and I?m certain they?ll be more fashion savvy than I am, because that?s what I hear and see all over the internet, so they can buy my fall wardrobe too!

Granted, I might be in my mid-40?s when this dream comes to fruition, but by 2025, the kids we have today, sadly I predict, are going to be totally capable of these little adult day-to-day duties. And the kids we remember being in the 70?s, 80?s and 90?s ? GI Joes and Rainbow Brites - asking for help with long division and hoping you don?t have to stay at grandma?s house on the weekends, aren?t likely to exist ? heck, they might even stop sending kids to school altogether, their homework will come over the internet with a robot tutor to instruct them and inject nutritional supplements! Yeeeaaaah, that might be an extreme, but anything?s possible at this point ? I mean, who would think that the cultural practice of fostering and protecting ?childhood? in anyone under the age of 18 would dissipate in a puff of advertising smoke after 300 years of solid, working, functional practice? Every adult seemed pretty darn happy with the results, didn?t they? We like happy, bouncing, slow to mature, cute, innocent kids, don?t we? They?re like puppies, right? Everyone loves puppies. So why the heck did we suddenly forget how to take care of our kids? The lesson is 300 years old! What made us forget? Was it the TV? Was it the Internet? Was it the advertising of some impossible dream of a happy family, a wealthy home, and everything you ever wanted if you just buy this product? Maybe.

The next scariest part is what we?re going to do about it. After 300 years, not only have we forgotten how to raise ?children? to stay ?children? until they?re old enough to know better, but we?ve forgotten how to handle the ones who grow up so quick. What do we do with the 10 year old sexually active boys and girls? We teach sex ed in kindergarten, that?s what we do. Brilliant! Please understand me, I?m not opposed to sex ed in kindergarten, I think we need it. It?s just sad to think, I had just stepped out of childhood when I read Neil?s book, to look back and see the distance growing between me and the generation behind me was non-existent. I thought I was an adult! The kids behind me are just as savvy, maybe even smarter and quicker and they sure as heck can hold more liquor than I can and not feel the effects of a hangover! Where?s my chance to foster childhood and play with the puppies?

I guess my chance to breed will come soon enough, but by then if I have a kid, and don?t let them get on the Internet, it?ll be like holding them back. Like retarding my child. Not letting them excel to their highest sponge-like potential - to be the youngest, smartest, videogame designer on the block! Geez-louise! Do you ever feel like you just woke up from some terrible nightmare where you were damned if you do and damned if you don?t - That we?re all going somewhere in the proverbial hand basket and nobody knows the direction, knows what?s right, or has the definitive answers? Gosh, I guess the only thing to do is be aware of the trip, take note of your surroundings, and go along for the ride ? at least I know the kid in me still likes to roll down the window, stick my hand out and surf the breeze. I guess I?ll just have to be sure to lay down the law, and make certain the adult in me teaches my kids how to surf safely with their childlike imagination, before I ever let them surf the net with their friends. >^,,^< - tia fix

October 20, 2005

Tia Fix Predicts WISP Will Destroy Telecom And Maybe Humans

Filed under: — tiafix @ Oct 20, 05 | 12:43 pm

I have a confession to make: a few months ago I glimpsed into the future and decided not to tell anyone about it. I wanted to keep all the mind-blowing revelations for my company and myself even though it could have benefited just about everyone in online marketing. If I was a cast member on the tv show Lost, I would have been Sawyer, keeping all the good tidbits for myself, minus the scruffy beard. The point is, I didn?t want to tell anyone about how I met with a local WISP (wireless internet service provider) to consult on how advertising could be implemented into their bid process for install jobs in townships, stadiums, and marinas throughout the country. That one consulting gig gave me a glimpse into ?the next big publishing partner? our industry would see develop over the next 8 to 14 months. That was a few months ago, but just last week, Google spilled the beans about their intentions to ?WISP? San Fran for free, right after Philadelphia announced EarthLink would be getting cash for their municipal WISP job. The secret was out: Major metro areas are about to go totally wireless, totally free, and the only thing consumers have to do to surf the net, is view, you guessed it, advertising.

There is plenty to be excited and wary about in regards to the new WISP landscape if you?re an Internet marketer. First you should know the good theoretical forecast: in exchange for free broadband access, consumers are going to be more receptive to the ads displayed on their laptop or PDA. Every WISP tech setup is different, but most require the consumer ‘log-in’ through a gateway, which essentially, is just a webpage that can host ads. It can host banner ads, it can host streaming media, and it can host ad-ware. It can do it all. Tens of thousands of consumers are going to be logging in, for free, in exchange for receiving ads, city-wide, stadium-wide, and cruising-in-their-boats-wide. Now, to really be cutting edge, all you have to do as a savvy internet marketer is secure your ?exclusive publisher contract? ? before all the WISPs get slammed by CPA affiliate managers asking them to run banner ads.

Sounds pretty good, right? The implications are astounding. Apparently so much so that telecoms have already lobbied in several states making it ILLEGAL for WISPs to be funded for a myriad of reasons - ranging from “don?t use taxpayers money to fund your free public WISP” to “unlawful competition”. I think I can make the analogy that outlawing WISP is akin to outlawing free newspapers. Maybe it?s a stretch, but holding back communities from broadband access because of ?unlawful competition? is ridiculous. Isn?t this America? (And yes, I apologize for using that clich?? in this rant, but it really seemed appropriate.) When did competition in industry become a bad thing? I’m not good with the legalese, but here?s an editorial piece that touches upon the cynicism and mood of how most techies (and I?d wager people in general) feel regarding the current corporate telecom players who fear free WISP and the states where laws have already been passed against them:

http://eprairie.com/news/viewnews.asp?newsletterID=11626 (scroll down to mid-page article)

I can go on and on why telecom would want to limit WISP development - but this isn’t the place to do it. Here?s a much better place to see all the action and down and dirty industry tech talk:

www.wispcentric.com

Or if you?re in Santa Clara, and are reading this early enough in the day, and feel like going to a tradeshow, this is killer (for everyone else, I guess there?s always next year):

www.ispcon.com

Finally, if you want to see a linked up page that will branch out your awareness of WISP, sans branches, check this out:

http://www.dailywireless.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3333

(The above link, even lists a good number of municipalities that are planning WISP deployment, so you can find their local provider and hit them up for ad serving.)

Now that I?ve empowered you, dear reader, with the insider lowdown on the WISP world benefits and controversies, I have one last confessional thought to leave you: did anyone ever see those Terminator movies with the guy who also plays the Governor of California? Do you remember the plot had something to do with a computer like thing that controlled America and then it went crazy and decided to kill all the humans? Yeah? Well, I was thinking, maybe that could be Google. Maybe it just starts by offering free WISP service in a big city filled with lots of people who could use it. Maybe that?s why Ma-Bell is lobbying against it. To protect us. That or maybe telecom knows that free WISP could be the best darn thing to happen since free newspapers and they want to control it. Oh wait - newspapers generally aren?t free unless they?re filled with ads. Oh! ?Maybe that makes telecom the Terminator?

- >^,,^< … { tia fix }

AIM: tiafix

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress